Researchers at the 麻豆视频, in collaboration with Florida International University, have released the second set of findings from a statewide survey. This portion, sponsored by the Florida Center for Cybersecurity at USF, addresses how Floridians are being affected by rising gasoline prices and issues related to Elon Musk鈥檚 potential purchase of the social media platform Twitter.
Among the key findings:
Over the past year, Floridians have been significantly impacted by the rising price of gasoline.
A majority of Floridians (83%) say that they are spending 鈥渁 lot more鈥� on gas than they were a year ago.
- Slightly more than half (51%) have changed travel or vacation plans in the past year due to the price of gas.
- A third of Floridians (38%) report that rising gas prices have affected their ability to pay other monthly bills.
- More than three-quarters (78%) have less money available for discretionary spending due to the rising price of gasoline.
- Over a third of Floridians (43%) have begun using digital apps to save money on gasoline.
- About a quarter (28%) say that the price of gas is negatively affecting their ability to get to work on a regular basis.
Most Floridians are dissatisfied with the government鈥檚 response to rising gas prices. A majority of Floridians are dissatisfied with President Biden (65%) and Congress鈥� (75%) handling of rising gas prices.In addition, 49% and 54% respectively indicated being 鈥渧ery dissatisfied鈥�.
There is strong, bipartisan support for policy interventions to lower the price of gasoline. A majority of Floridians (72%) are in favor of increasing domestic oil production as a means of lowering the price of gasoline. A similar number (70%) would support a temporary suspension of the U.S. federal gas tax. In each case, majorities of Democrats, Republicans and Independents support these measures.
While Elon Musk鈥檚 purchase of Twitter remains in question, Floridians are divided on what it will mean for American democracy if the deal is finalized. 42% of respondents 鈥渘either support nor oppose鈥� Musk鈥檚 purchase of the social media platform. However, Floridians are divided on whether its implications for American democracy would be good (24%), bad (20%), or neutral (33%). However, a majority are supportive of some specific measures he has proposed for the platform, such as:
- Making Twitter鈥檚 algorithm for targeting content and ads publicly available (64%).
- Only limiting offensive content if it is illegal (50%).
- Doing more to eliminate 鈥渂ots鈥� (non-human accounts) from the platform (88%).
Social media platforms are viewed by most as 鈥減rivate spaces鈥� that should not be regulated by government. The potential sale of Twitter has raised significant questions about the role of social media platforms in American public life. More than half of Floridians (52%) say that platforms such as Twitter are 鈥減rivate spaces鈥� that should be regulated only by private companies. Far less (28%) view such platforms as 鈥減ublic squares鈥� where government should regulate content, while 20% remain 鈥渦nsure鈥�.
Most believe that these platforms have a responsibility to remove content deemed harmful or dangerous, but opinions are split when it comes to other limitations on speech. Floridians believe that social media platforms should remove content deemed false/misleading (77%) or harmful/dangerous to individuals or groups (77%). However, there is less agreement on whether users should be allowed to post content that may be considered offensive by others. Well more than half (61%) say that people should be allowed to say whatever they want, regardless of whether others find it offensive, while 39% disagree.
A majority of Floridians do not trust social media companies to monitor the appropriateness of content in a fair and neutral way. While a majority of Floridians say that social media platforms should be self-regulated as private companies, most say that they don鈥檛 trust social media platforms to do so in a fair and neutral way. Two-thirds (66%) indicated little to no belief in the possibility for fair moderation of content, with a plurality (32%) having no faith in their neutrality.
The survey included a representative sample of 600 Floridians, fielded July 2-10, 2022. Results are reported with a confidence level of 95% and a margin of error +/-4 %.
The complete survey results can be found here.